Creatures in Crisis
Photograph of Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink (Tiliqua adelaidensis), recorded as Endangered
Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink (Tiliqua adelaidensis). Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Endangered

Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink

Tiliqua adelaidensis

Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink is a skink in the family Scincidae — Tiliqua adelaidensis, recorded as Endangered and tied to Australia.

Status
Endangered
Scientific name
Tiliqua adelaidensis
Recorded from
Australia
Taxonomy
Squamata · Scincidae · Tiliqua

The skink

Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink is a skink in the family Scincidae — Tiliqua adelaidensis.

Range and habitat

Known locations of the species extend from Kapunda in the Light River valley, about 77 kilometres (48 mi) north east of Adelaide, northwards to Peterborough, about 254 kilometres (158 mi) north of Adelaide.

Conservation efforts to maintain the species include the establishment of the Tiliqua Pygmy Bluetongue Reserve near Burra, by the Nature Foundation SA in 2010.

Pins are Wikidata “endemic to” fields. Orange dots, when present, are GBIF occurrence tiles — survey bias included.

Diet

Most skinks forage in leaf litter or under cover. Burrowing species slip through sand or soil more than they climb.

In crisis

The species was previously thought to be extinct and only rediscovered in 1992. Found only in the Mid North of South Australia, T. Adelaidensis was for a time believed to be extinct. It was rediscovered in 1992, when a researcher found the remains of an adult male T. Adelaidensis in the stomach contents of a dead brown snake, near Burra.

The pygmy bluetongue is now considered to be an endangered species. The habitat and range of pygmy bluetongues is very restricted, as individuals live in old spider burrows within areas of unploughed native grasslands, that have become rare due to extensive development of cereal cropping throughout the region.

Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink is Endangered on this catalog because that is the IUCN category stored on Wikidata. Confirm the official criteria and any later count on iucnredlist.org.

Sources

Written for this catalog from the English Wikipedia article on Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink, Wikidata item Q892717. Family and order context is original field-guide writing about the group, not a copied assessment of this one species. Wikipedia text is CC BY-SA. Not an IUCN assessment. Counts, when quoted, can change — confirm them on the recovery programme and on iucnredlist.org.

Photograph via Wikimedia Commons. Wikipedia · Wikidata · IUCN Red List.

Also in this catalog

Photograph of Vaquita (Phocoena sinus), recorded as Critically EndangeredCR

Vaquita

Phocoena sinus
Photograph of Javan rhinoceros (Rhinoceros sondaicus), recorded as Critically EndangeredCR

Javan rhinoceros

Rhinoceros sondaicus
Photograph of Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii), recorded as Critically EndangeredCR

Sumatran orangutan

Pongo abelii
Photograph of Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), recorded as Critically EndangeredCR

Axolotl

Ambystoma mexicanum

Quick answers

What is Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink?
Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink is a skink in the family Scincidae — Tiliqua adelaidensis.
What is the conservation status of Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink?
Endangered, as the IUCN category stored on Wikidata for Tiliqua adelaidensis. Confirm the official assessment on iucnredlist.org.
Where does Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink live?
Known locations of the species extend from Kapunda in the Light River valley, about 77 kilometres (48 mi) north east of Adelaide, northwards to Peterborough, about 254 kilometres (158 mi) north of Adelaide.
Why is Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink in crisis?
Since their rediscovery, surveys have estimated that 5,000 to 7,000 individuals live in scattered areas between Kapunda and Peterborough.
Is this the IUCN Red List page for Tiliqua adelaidensis?
No. This is a researched catalog account. The Red List is the assessment.
Is Adelaide pigmy blue-tongue skink a pet?
An animal on this catalog is in crisis in the wild. Keeping one is usually the wrong question.